How can I make VS Code add parentheses when autocompleting functions?
It can be solved by ticking javascript.suggest.completeFunctionCalls property up.
It can be solved by ticking javascript.suggest.completeFunctionCalls property up.
Here’s a relatively dumb example, but it does have a different result: #define Streq(s1, s2) (strcmp((s1), (s2)) == 0) #define MyStreq(s1, s2) (strcmp(s1, s2) == 0) #define s1 “foo”, “blah” int main() { Streq(s1, “blah”); // Compiles and compares equal. MyStreq(s1, “blah”); // Compiler error. Too many parameters. }
There is a plain-text database of information about every Unicode character available from the Unicode Consortium; the format is described in Unicode Annex #44. The primary information is contained in UnicodeData.txt. Open and close punctuation characters are denoted with Ps (punctuation start) and Pe (punctuation end) in the General_Category field (the third field, delimited by … Read more
You don’t make it clear exactly what the specification of your function is, but this behaviour seems wrong to me: >>> ParseNestedParen(‘(a)(b)(c)’, 0) [‘a)(b)(c’] >>> nested_paren.ParseNestedParen(‘(a)(b)(c)’, 1) [‘b’] >>> nested_paren.ParseNestedParen(‘(a)(b)(c)’, 2) [”] Other comments on your code: Docstring says “generate”, but function returns a list, not a generator. Since only one string is ever returned, … Read more
Your code has some confusion in its handling of the ‘{‘ and ‘}’ characters. It should be entirely parallel to how you handle ‘(‘ and ‘)’. This code, modified slightly from yours, seems to work properly: public static boolean isParenthesisMatch(String str) { if (str.charAt(0) == ‘{‘) return false; Stack<Character> stack = new Stack<Character>(); char c; … Read more
$string = “ABC (Test1)”; echo preg_replace(“/\([^)]+\)/”,””,$string); // ‘ABC ‘ preg_replace is a perl-based regular expression replace routine. What this script does is matches all occurrences of a opening parenthesis, followed by any number of characters not a closing parenthesis, and again followed by a closing parenthesis, and then deletes them: Regular expression breakdown: / – … Read more
In the absence of any preprocessor stuff going on, foo‘s signature is equivalent to int foo (int *bar) The only context in which I’ve seen people putting seemingly unnecessary parentheses around function names is when there are both a function and a function-like macro with the same name, and the programmer wants to prevent macro … Read more
TL;DR Extra parentheses change the meaning of a C++ program in the following contexts: preventing argument-dependent name lookup enabling the comma operator in list contexts ambiguity resolution of vexing parses deducing referenceness in decltype expressions preventing preprocessor macro errors Preventing argument-dependent name lookup As is detailed in Annex A of the Standard, a post-fix expression … Read more
There are a few things going on here. First is the immediately invoked function expression (IIFE) pattern: (function() { // Some code })(); This provides a way to execute some JavaScript code in its own scope. It’s usually used so that any variables created within the function won’t affect the global scope. You could use … Read more
Both operators the addition + operator and the concatenation . operator have the same operator precedence, but since they are left associative they get evaluated like the following: echo ((“sum:” . $a) + $b); echo (“sum:” . ($a + $b)); So your first line does the concatenation first and ends up with: “sum: 1” + … Read more