SQL, How to Concatenate results?
With MSSQL you can do something like this: declare @result varchar(500) set @result=”” select @result = @result + ModuleValue + ‘, ‘ from TableX where ModuleId = @ModuleId
With MSSQL you can do something like this: declare @result varchar(500) set @result=”” select @result = @result + ModuleValue + ‘, ‘ from TableX where ModuleId = @ModuleId
”.join(lst) The only Pythonic way: clear (that is what all the big boys do and what they expect to see), simple (no additional imports needed, and stable across all versions), fast (written in C) and concise (on an empty string, join elements of iterable!).
One way would be to create a FileStream with the FileMode.Append creation mode. Opens the file if it exists and seeks to the end of the file, or creates a new file. This would look something like: public static void AppendAllBytes(string path, byte[] bytes) { //argument-checking here. using (var stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Append)) { … Read more
This is basic operator precedence, combined with String concatenation vs numerical addition. Quoting: If only one operand expression is of type String, then string conversion (§5.1.11) is performed on the other operand to produce a string at run time. The result of string concatenation is a reference to a String object that is the concatenation … Read more
Whatever works best for you works… But if you want to go for speed use this: echo ‘Welcome ‘, $name, ‘!’; The single quotes tell PHP that no interpretation is needed, and the comma tells PHP to just echo the string, no concatenation needed.
more +2 file2.txt > temp type temp file1.txt > out.txt or you can use copy. See copy /? for more. copy /b temp+file1.txt out.txt
Yes, LINQ to Objects supports this with Enumerable.Concat: var together = first.Concat(second); NB: Should first or second be null you would receive a ArgumentNullException. To avoid this & treat nulls as you would an empty set, use the null coalescing operator like so: var together = (first ?? Enumerable.Empty<string>()).Concat(second ?? Enumerable.Empty<string>()); //amending `<string>` to the … Read more
Slowest and doesn’t work in Python3: concatenate the items and call dict on the resulting list: $ python -mtimeit -s’d1={1:2,3:4}; d2={5:6,7:9}; d3={10:8,13:22}’ \ ‘d4 = dict(d1.items() + d2.items() + d3.items())’ 100000 loops, best of 3: 4.93 usec per loop Fastest: exploit the dict constructor to the hilt, then one update: $ python -mtimeit -s’d1={1:2,3:4}; d2={5:6,7:9}; … Read more
+ and . have the same operator precedence, but are left associative. Means after the first concatenation: ‘(‘ . (int)$data[‘event_id’] The string got added with your key, e.g. “($data[‘event_id’]” + $key So the string gets converted into an integer in that numerical context and disappears. To solve this use parentheses () around your addition.