There is bug when using MockSequence on same mock. It definitely will be fixed in later releases of Moq library (you can also fix it manually by changing Moq.MethodCall.Matches implementation). If you want to use Moq only, then you can verify method call order via callbacks: int callOrder = 0; writerMock.Setup(x => x.Write(expectedType)).Callback(() => Assert.That(callOrder++, … Read more
I would: for _ in range(3): do() The _ is convention for a variable whose value you don’t care about. You might also see some people write: [do() for _ in range(3)] however that is slightly more expensive because it creates a list containing the return values of each invocation of do() (even if it’s … Read more
Not sure about regex, but there is a way for you to do this in Notepad++, although it isn’t very flexible. In the example that you gave, hold Alt and select the column of numbers that you wish to change. Then go to Edit->Column Editor and select the Number to Insert radio button in the … Read more
There’s a much better way to do this than using synchronous ajax calls. Jquery ajax returns a deferred so you can just use pipe chaining to make sure that each ajax call finishes before the next runs. Here’s a working example with a more in depth example you can play with on jsfiddle. // How … Read more
Resolve promises one after another (i.e. in sequence)?