Is it possible to mock a static method using Rhino.Mocks No, it is not possible. TypeMock can do this because it utilizes the CLR profiler to intercept and redirect calls. RhinoMocks, NMock, and Moq cannot do this because these libraries are simpler; they don’t use the CLR profiler APIs. They are simpler in that they … Read more
As per this … Put simply there is a difference between Mock and Stub objects and RhinoMocks recognizes that allowing us to write tests that better state their purpose. Mock objects are used to define expectations i.e: In this scenario I expect method A() to be called with such and such parameters. Mocks record and … Read more
Using MoQ it looks something like this: var request = new Mock<HttpRequestBase>(); request.Expect(r => r.HttpMethod).Returns(“GET”); var mockHttpContext = new Mock<HttpContextBase>(); mockHttpContext.Expect(c => c.Request).Returns(request.Object); var controllerContext = new ControllerContext(mockHttpContext.Object , new RouteData(), new Mock<ControllerBase>().Object); I think the Rhino Mocks syntax is similar.
Using Moq: var request = new Mock<HttpRequestBase>(); // Not working – IsAjaxRequest() is static extension method and cannot be mocked // request.Setup(x => x.IsAjaxRequest()).Returns(true /* or false */); // use this request.SetupGet(x => x.Headers).Returns( new System.Net.WebHeaderCollection { {“X-Requested-With”, “XMLHttpRequest”} }); var context = new Mock<HttpContextBase>(); context.SetupGet(x => x.Request).Returns(request.Object); var controller = new YourController(); controller.ControllerContext = … Read more