Put /*ignore jslint start*/ before and /*ignore jslint end*/ after the code to be ignored. Ex: function ignore(){ /*ignore jslint start*/ var x; var y; /*ignore jslint end*/ } Or export JsLint settings, define your IgnoreErrorStart/ IgnoreErrorEnd symbols and import. Edit Some folks may confuse this answer with JSHint. In that case, use these: /*jshint … Read more
As this is the top rated google hit and other people might not be seeing it at first in the jslint tool, there is a option called “Tolerate misordered definitions” that allows you to hide this type of error. /*jslint latedef:false*/
From the documentation JSLint also recognizes a /*global */ directive that can indicate to JSLint that variables used in this file were defined in other files. The comment can contain a comma separated list of names. Each name can optionally be followed by a colon and either true or false, true indicating that the variable … Read more
It always a good practice to pass radix with parseInt – parseInt(string, radix) For decimal – parseInt(id.substring(id.length – 1), 10) If the radix parameter is omitted, JavaScript assumes the following: If the string begins with “0x”, the radix is 16 (hexadecimal) If the string begins with “0”, the radix is 8 (octal). This feature is … Read more
Your code might be perfectly correct (it might also be problematic, depending on how you call testConstr). My suggestion is: tell JSLint to shut up Or don’t use JSLint at all.
IMO, blindly using ===, without trying to understand how type conversion works doesn’t make much sense. The primary fear about the Equals operator == is that the comparison rules depending on the types compared can make the operator non-transitive, for example, if: A == B AND B == C Doesn’t really guarantees that: A == … Read more
It only will do this if you have the option selected at the bottom: Disallow insecure . and [^…] in /RegExp/ From the docs: true if . and [^…] should not be allowed in RegExp literals. These forms should not be used when validating in secure applications. So the answer your question, if you start … Read more
Move the function outside the loop: function dummy() { return this.name_; } // Or: var dummy = function() {return this.name;}; for (var i = 0; i<processorList.length; ++i) { result[i] = { processor_: timestampsToDateTime(processorList[i]), name_: processorList[i].processorName, getLabel: dummy }; } … Or just ignore the message by using the loopfunc option at the top of the … Read more
Update June, 2017: Subject to support (e.g. if you’re not running JavaScript in Internet Explorer 10 or below), you should look into using let instead of var. For example: for(let i=0; …; i++) There’s no way I’m going to put var i; from a for(var i=0; …; i++) at the top of my functions. Especially … Read more
Partially it depends on whether you’re using a function expression or a function declaration. They’re different things, they happen at different times, and they have a different effect on the surrounding scope. So let’s start with the distinction. A function expression is a function production where you’re using the result as a right-hand value — e.g., … Read more