Since you want to see if search contains a word which is contained in the description of p you basically need to test for each value in search if it is contained in the description of p result = from p in products where search.Any(val => p.Description.Contains(val)) select p; This is c# syntax for the … Read more
Arrays can only be compared with Arrays.equals(). You probably want an ArrayList of ArrayLists. ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>> j = new ArrayList<ArrayList<Integer>>(); ArrayList<Integer> w = new ArrayList<Integer>(); w.add(1); w.add(2); j.add(w); ArrayList<Integer> t = new ArrayList<Integer>(); t.add(1); t.add(2); return j.contains(t); // should return true.
It looks like your misconception was that you expected PowerShell’s -contains operator to perform substring matching against the elements of the LHS array. Instead, it performs equality tests – as -eq would – against the array’s elements – see this answer for details. In order to perform literal substring matching against the elements of an … Read more
List<T>.Contains uses EqualityComparer<T>.Default, which in turn uses IEquatable<T> if the type implements it, or object.Equals otherwise. You could just implement IEquatable<T> but it’s a good idea to override object.Equals if you do so, and a very good idea to override GetHashCode() if you do that: public class SomeIDdClass : IEquatable<SomeIDdClass> { private readonly int _id; … Read more
Looking at the other attempts saddens me 🙁 public IQueryable<Part> SearchForParts(string[] query) { var q = db.Parts.AsQueryable(); foreach (var qs in query) { var likestr = string.Format(“%{0}%”, qs); q = q.Where(x => SqlMethods.Like(x.partName, likestr)); } return q; } Assumptions: partName looks like: “ABC 123 XYZ” query is { “ABC”, “123”, “XY” }
I don’t think there is a built-in function that will handle what you want. You could easily write a contains() function however: function contains($str, array $arr) { foreach($arr as $a) { if (stripos($str,$a) !== false) return true; } return false; }
There is a method called containsAll declared in the java.util.Collection interface. In your setting one.containsAll(two) gives the desired answer.
You can use the text method and pass a function that returns the modified text, using the native String.prototype.replace method to perform the replacement: $(“.text_div”).text(function () { return $(this).text().replace(“contains”, “hello everyone”); }); Here’s a working example.
Answer To find li‘s that have text containing BOTH Mary AND John: $(‘li:contains(“Mary”):contains(“John”)’) To find li‘s that have text containing EITHER Mary OR John: $(‘li:contains(“Mary”), li:contains(“John”)’) Explanation Just think of the :contains as if it was a class declaration, like .class: $(‘li.one.two’). // Find <li>’s with classes of BOTH one AND two $(‘li.one, li.two’). // … Read more
The second (assuming you means CONTAINS, and actually put it in a valid query) should be faster, because it can use some form of index (in this case, a full text index). Of course, this form of query is only available if the column is in a full text index. If it isn’t, then only … Read more