A class’s name includes it’s namespace, so name1.Foo
and name1.name2.Foo
are two completely separate types. So the short answer to your question is: No.
Why do you need to do something like this?
A class’s name includes it’s namespace, so name1.Foo
and name1.name2.Foo
are two completely separate types. So the short answer to your question is: No.
Why do you need to do something like this?