Yes, it is too slow.
I ran into this problem several years ago while developing Paint.NET (right from the start, actually, and it was rather frustrating!). Rendering performance was abysmal, as it was always proportional to the size of the bitmap and not the size of the area that it was told to redraw. That is, framerate went down as the size of the bitmap went up, and framerate never went up as the size of the invalid/redraw area went down when implementing OnPaint() and calling Graphics.DrawImage(). A small bitmap, say 800×600, always worked fine, but larger images (e.g. 2400×1800) were very slow. (You can assume, for the preceding paragraph anyway, that nothing extra was going on, such as scaling with some expensive Bicubic filter, which would have adversely affected performance.)
It is possible to force WinForms into using GDI instead of GDI+ and avoid even the creation of a Graphics
object behind the scenes, at which point you can layer another rendering toolkit on top of that (e.g. Direct2D). However, it’s not simple. I do this in Paint.NET, and you can see what’s required by using something like Reflector on the class called GdiPaintControl
in the SystemLayer DLL, but for what you’re doing I’d consider it a last resort.
However, the bitmap size you’re using (800×1200) should still work OK enough in GDI+ without having to resort to advanced interop, unless you’re targeting something as low as a 300MHz Pentium II. Here are some tips that might help out:
- If you are using an opaque bitmap (no alpha/transparency) in the call to
Graphics.DrawImage()
, and especially if it’s a 32-bit bitmap with an alpha channel (but you know it’s opaque, or you don’t care), then setGraphics.CompositingMode
toCompositingMode.SourceCopy
before callingDrawImage()
(be sure to set it back to the original value after, otherwise regular drawing primitives will look very ugly). This skips a lot of extra blending math per-pixel. - Make sure
Graphics.InterpolationMode
isn’t set to something likeInterpolationMode.HighQualityBicubic
. UsingNearestNeighbor
will be the fastest, although if there’s any stretching it may not look very good (unless it’s stretching by exactly 2x, 3x, 4x, etc.)Bilinear
is usually a good compromise. You should never use anything butNearestNeighbor
if the bitmap size matches the area you’re drawing to, in pixels. - Always draw into the
Graphics
object given to you inOnPaint()
. - Always do your drawing in
OnPaint
. If you need to redraw an area, callInvalidate()
. If you need the drawing to happen right now, callUpdate()
afterInvalidate()
. This is a reasonable approach since WM_PAINT messages (which results in a call toOnPaint()
) are “low priority” messages. Any other processing by the window manager will be done first, and thus you could end up with lots of frame skipping and hitching otherwise. - Using a
System.Windows.Forms.Timer
as a framerate/tick timer won’t work very well. These are implemented using Win32’sSetTimer
and result in WM_TIMER messages which then result in theTimer.Tick
event being raised, and WM_TIMER is another low priority message which is sent only when the message queue is empty. You’re better off usingSystem.Threading.Timer
and then usingControl.Invoke()
(to make sure you’re on the right thread!) and callingControl.Update()
. - In general, do not use
Control.CreateGraphics()
. (corollary to ‘always draw inOnPaint()
‘ and ‘always use theGraphics
given to you byOnPaint()
‘) - I recommend not using the Paint event handler. Instead, implement
OnPaint()
in the class you’re writing which should be derived fromControl
. Deriving from another class, e.g.PictureBox
orUserControl
, will either not add any value for you or will add additional overhead. (BTWPictureBox
is often misunderstood. You will probably almost never want to use it.)
Hope that helps.