We did something similar (not 100% the same, but similar) in a LINQ to SQL project. Here’s the code:
public static IQueryable<T> OrderBy<T>(this IQueryable<T> source, string ordering, params object[] values) {
var type = typeof(T);
var property = type.GetProperty(ordering);
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(type, "p");
var propertyAccess = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, property);
var orderByExp = Expression.Lambda(propertyAccess, parameter);
MethodCallExpression resultExp = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), "OrderBy", new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType }, source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExp));
return source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(resultExp);
}
We didn’t actually use a generic, we had a known class, but it should work on a generic (I’ve put the generic placeholder where it should be).
Edit: For descending order, pass in OrderByDescending
instead of “OrderBy”:
MethodCallExpression resultExp = Expression.Call(typeof(Queryable), "OrderByDescending", new Type[] { type, property.PropertyType }, source.Expression, Expression.Quote(orderByExp));