Edit: The proper way of doing this the way described in Catalina Astengo’s answer as it uses the real router functionality with just the history/routing state mocked rather than mocking the entire hook. The way I ended up solving it was by mocking the hooks in my tests using jest.mock: // TeamPage.test.js jest.mock(‘react-router-dom’, () => … Read more
Adding an Api Call in a focus callBack in the screen you’re returning to solves the issue. componentDidMount() { this.props.fetchData(); this.willFocusSubscription = this.props.navigation.addListener( ‘willFocus’, () => { this.props.fetchData(); } ); } componentWillUnmount() { this.willFocusSubscription.remove(); } UPDATE 2023: willFocus event was renamed to focus componentDidMount() { this.props.fetchData(); this.focusSubscription = this.props.navigation.addListener( ‘focus’, () => { this.props.fetchData(); } … Read more
I got the above error message and it was extremely cryptic. I tried the other solutions mentioned and it didn’t work. Turns out I accidentally forgot to include the to prop in one of the <Link /> components. Even if the <Link /> does not require a to prop, you simply just add and write … Read more
CESCO’s answer renders first the component AppShell then one of the components inside Switch. But these components are NOT going to render inside AppShell, they will NOT be children of AppShell. In v4 to wrap components you don’t put anymore your Routes inside another Route, you put your Routes directly inside a component. I.E : … Read more
On the Link component you can now add activeClassName or set activeStyle. These allow you to easily add styles to the currently active link. Previously, you could create a custom component that works like a wrapper to Link with the following logic. In a file called nav_link.js import React from ‘react’; import { Link } … Read more
In the Route component, specify a random key. <Route path={YOURPATH} render={(props) => <YourComp {…props} keyProp={someValue} key={randomGen()}/>} /> when react see a different key, they will trigger rerender.
The ability to parse query strings was taken out of V4 because there have been requests over the years to support different implementation. With that, the team decided it would be best for users to decide what that implementation looks like. We recommend importing a query string lib. Here’s one that I use const queryString … Read more
After quite a bit of digging through the source code to understand how path parsing was different in RRDv6 from RRDv5, and turned up nothing really other than they no longer use path-to-regex, I hit up the repo’s issues section and found this issue which outright states they don’t plan to support optional path parameters … Read more
If I understand your question about a “default” route correctly then I am interpreting this as one of the following: Use an index route: You can wrap a set of routes in a layout route and specify an index route: <Routes> <Route path=”/*”> <Route index element={<ComponentA />} /> <Route path=”pathB” element={<ComponentB />} /> <Route path=”pathC” … Read more