Difference between abstraction and encapsulation?

by

Most answers here focus on OOP but encapsulation begins much earlier:

  • Every function is an encapsulation; in pseudocode:

    point x = { 1, 4 }
point y = { 23, 42 }

numeric d = distance(x, y)

    Here, distance encapsulates the calculation of the (Euclidean) distance between two points in a plane: it hides implementation details. This is encapsulation, pure and simple.

  • Abstraction is the process of generalisation: taking a concrete implementation and making it applicable to different, albeit somewhat related, types of data. The classical example of abstraction is C’s qsort function to sort data:

    The thing about qsort is that it doesn’t care about the data it sorts — in fact, it doesn’t know what data it sorts. Rather, its input type is a typeless pointer (void*) which is just C’s way of saying “I don’t care about the type of data” (this is also called type erasure). The important point is that the implementation of qsort always stays the same, regardless of data type. The only thing that has to change is the compare function, which differs from data type to data type. qsort therefore expects the user to provide said compare function as a function argument.

Encapsulation and abstraction go hand in hand so much so that you could make the point that they are truly inseparable. For practical purposes, this is probably true; that said, here’s an encapsulation that’s not much of an abstraction:

class point {
    numeric x
    numeric y
}

We encapsulate the point’s coordinate, but we don’t materially abstract them away, beyond grouping them logically.

And here’s an example of abstraction that’s not encapsulation:

T pi<T> = 3.1415926535

This is a generic variable pi with a given value (π), and the declaration doesn’t care about the exact type of the variable. Admittedly, I’d be hard-pressed to find something like this in real code: abstraction virtually always uses encapsulation. However, the above does actually exist in C++(14), via variable templates (= generic templates for variables); with a slightly more complex syntax, e.g.:

template <typename T> constexpr T pi = T{3.1415926535};

Leave a Comment

tech